All hardware

Best AI models that run on 8× RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell server (768 GB)

Quarter-DGX-H200 price, two-thirds the memory.

NVIDIA · 4U server (e.g. SuperMicro AS-4125GS-TNRT)
8× RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell server (768 GB)
768 GB 744 GB usable 1792 GB/s $78k
switch in the live picker →

What models fit this build

8× RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell server (768 GB) has 744 GB of usable memory. Here's which open-weights model sizes fit at each quant, at ~8K context with an FP8 KV cache.

Largest comfortable fit: 1T+ MoE at Q5 (~710 GB).

Model size Q2Q4Q5Q8
7–8B Fits Fits Fits Fits
13–14B Fits Fits Fits Fits
30–32B Fits Fits Fits Fits
70–72B Fits Fits Fits Fits
~120B MoE Fits Fits Fits Fits
~235B MoE Fits Fits Fits Fits
~670B MoE Fits Fits Fits Fits
1T+ MoE Fits Fits Fits Won't fit

✓ = the weights + FP8 KV cache fit within this build's usable memory at ~8K context. Longer context needs more — size any model in the picker →

Our picks for this build

Sourced from the State of Local AI snapshot — the model + quant + backend we'd actually deploy on this hardware today, with the recipe in the setup guide below.

Recommended

Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B (MoE)

397 B · 17B active Apache 2.0 🤗

Feb 17 2026 flagship. 397B / 17B-active hybrid GDN-MoE — was the open-weights coding king pre-Qwen 3.6 (SWE-V 76.4, LCB v6 83.6, AIME26 91.3). First Qwen open-weights with native vision. ~25 tok/s on a 256 GB M3 Ultra with offload.

≥262 GB Q4 285 t/s
  • HLE37.6%
  • TB252.5%
  • SWE-Pro50.9%
  • SWE-Ver76.4%

Coding: From mid-Feb through April 2026 this was the local-coding king — daily-driver in Cline, Roo Code, Aider, Open-Claude, Continue via llama-server or vLLM. Now decisively dethroned by Qwen 3.6 27B (SWE-Ver 77.2 vs 76.4) and Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B on every coding eval per Qwen's own comparison table. Still a heavyweight generalist.

Agent: First 200B+ open MoE genuinely usable for autonomous loops — TAU2-Bench 86.7, TB2 52.5, MCP-Mark 46.1. Pair with 256 GB M3 Ultra (Q4 ~25 tok/s) or a multi-H100 box. Open-Claude users have largely moved to GLM-5.1 / Kimi K2.6 / DeepSeek V4 for new long-horizon work.

Also runs well

Kimi K2.5 1T (MoE)

1000 B · 32B active Modified MIT 🤗

Same architecture as K2; long-horizon agent training + native image input. Strong open-weights agent — close to closed frontier.

≥600 GB Q4 40 t/s
  • HLE30.1%
  • TB243.2%
  • SWE-Pro50.7%
  • SWE-Ver76.8%

Coding: Strong open-weights coder with native image input. Powers Cursor Composer 2.5 (released May 18 2026) at $0.50/M input — Cursor kept the K2.5 backbone from Composer 2 rather than swapping to K2.6, betting RL fine-tuning closes the gap. r/LocalLLaMA uses it in Cline via OpenRouter when self-hosting isn't feasible (1T weights). On general benchmarks mostly superseded by K2.6.

Agent: Long-horizon agent training paid off — Agent Swarm with up to 100 sub-agents. Reliable for 30-60 min Open-Claude tasks. The Cursor Composer 2.5 deal validates K2.5 as a production-grade agentic-coding base; K2.6 still has the higher ceiling on long-horizon work when available.

Also runs well

GLM-5.1 754B (MoE)

754 B · 40B active MIT 🤗

First open-weights model to top SWE-Bench Pro (April 2026). 8-hour autonomous coding agent. MIT.

≥480 GB Q4 69 t/s
  • HLE52.3%
  • TB263.5%
  • SWE-Pro58.4%
  • SWE-Ver77.8%

Coding: First open-weights model to top SWE-Bench Pro (tied with Kimi K2.6 at 58.6 this week, GLM-5.1 at 58.4). r/LocalLLaMA / r/ZaiGLM use it via Z.ai Coding Plan as a Claude-Code replacement — quoted as '94% of Opus 4.6 at 1/10 the cost.' Not in the top OpenRouter coding by token volume — adoption flows through Z.ai's own coding plan.

Agent: Built for 8-hour autonomous execution — hundreds of rounds, thousands of tool calls. Closest open-weights model to closed-frontier on long-horizon agent work (only K2.6 / V4-Pro compete).

Setup guide for 8× RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell server (768 GB)

Every known recipe for running a model on this build — sourced from the State of Local AI 2026-07-05 snapshot (2026-07-05). Pick the one that matches your model + quant, then follow the linked original write-up.

Recipes for 8× RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell server (768 GB)
ModelDecode tok/sPrompt processingRecipeRuns
qwen3-5-397b-a17b-moe@ NVFP4 on SGLang+MTP~350@ 4Klocal-inference-lab/rtx6kpro wiki (Qwen3.5-397B 8x single-batch)
kimi-k2-5-1t-moe@ INT4 (BF16 KV, EP=8, overclocked GDDR7) on SGLang+MTP~101@ 4Klocal-inference-lab/rtx6kpro wiki (Kimi K2.5 8x single-batch decode)
kimi-k2-5-1t-moe@ INT4 (FP8 KV, DCP=8) on vLLMbatch~900@ 40K (100-conc. aggregate)local-inference-lab/rtx6kpro wiki (Kimi K2.5 high concurrency, Festr)
glm-51-754b-moe@ NVFP4-MTP (lukealonso/GLM-5.1-NVFP4-MTP, served as GLM-5) on SGLang+MTP~100@ 4Klocal-inference-lab/rtx6kpro wiki (GLM-5 single-batch decode; models/glm5.md = GLM-5.1)

Want to compare this against other builds? Open the live picker (Q2 / Q4 / Q5 / Q8 toggles) or see best build by budget.

See all recipes

Every open-weights model that fits, ranked by composite score

Composite blends benchmark averages (60 %) with editorial 0-5 ratings (40 %). Closed-frontier references mix into the ranking and stay amber-tinted.

Modeltg/sppTTFT @ 100KHLETB2SWE-ProSWE-VerAiderLCBGPQAMMLU-ProScore
Qwen 3 235B-A22B (MoE)235 B · 22 B active · moe🤗
220 t/s14,500 pp10 s70.7%81.1%84.4%4964
Qwen 3 Next 80B-A3B (MoE)80 B · 3 B active · moe🤗
30,000 pp4.7 s78.4%77.2%82.7%4920
77 t/s9,200 pp15 s77.6%4689
GLM-5.1 754B (MoE)754 B · 40 B active · moe🤗
69 t/s4,200 pp40 s52.3%63.5%58.4%77.8%84.1%86.2%91.7%4630
Qwen 3.5 9B9 B · dense🤗
373 t/s75,000 pp1.9 s65.6%81.7%82.5%4623
GLM-4.5-Air 106B (MoE)106 B · 12 B active · moe🤗
30,000 pp4.7 s57.6%4488
Kimi K2.6 1T (MoE)1000 B · 32 B active · moe🤗
40 t/s2,600 pp1.1 min35.9%66.7%58.6%80.2%89.6%90.5%4479
DeepSeek V4-Flash 284B (MoE)284 B · 13 B active · moe🤗
372 t/s14,500 pp10 s29.4%56.9%52.6%79.0%91.6%88.1%86.4%4379
88 t/s14,500 pp10 s26.7%71.9%89.0%87.0%86.8%4372
DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B26 B · 4 B active · diffusion-moe🤗
660 t/s21,000 pp6.5 s69.1%73.2%77.6%4358
Mistral Small 4 119B-A6B (MoE)119 B · 6 B active · moe🤗
30,000 pp4.7 s71.2%4301
Qwen 3.5 397B-A17B (MoE)397 B · 17 B active · moe🤗
285 t/s14,500 pp10 s37.6%52.5%50.9%76.4%83.6%88.4%87.8%4300
220 t/s21,000 pp6.5 s24.0%59.3%53.5%77.2%83.9%87.8%86.2%4280
Qwen 3 32B32 B · dense🤗
186 t/s21,000 pp6.5 s65.7%65.5%4278
Kimi K2.5 1T (MoE)1000 B · 32 B active · moe🤗
40 t/s2,600 pp1.1 min30.1%43.2%50.7%76.8%85.0%87.6%87.1%4213
GLM-5.2 753B (MoE)753 B · 39 B active · moe🤗
71 t/s4,200 pp40 s54.7%62.1%91.2%4200
140 t/s9,200 pp15 s57.5%65.2%84.0%4171
Phi-4 14B14 B · dense🤗
310 t/s43,000 pp3.2 s56.1%70.4%4160
DeepSeek V3 671B (MoE)671 B · 37 B active · moe🤗
75 t/s4,200 pp40 s22.2%39.6%74.2%89.6%79.9%85.0%4151
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B (MoE)35 B · 3 B active · moe🤗
660 t/s21,000 pp6.5 s21.4%51.5%49.5%73.4%80.4%86.0%85.2%4084
Qwen 3.5 122B-A10B (MoE)122 B · 10 B active · moe🤗
30,000 pp4.7 s25.3%49.4%72.0%78.9%86.6%86.7%4021
Tencent Hy3 295B-A21B (MoE)295 B · 21 B active · moe🤗
230 t/s14,500 pp10 s25.5%54.4%57.9%78.0%90.4%87.4%3971
Llama 4 Maverick 400B-A17B (MoE)400 B · 17 B active · moe🤗
285 t/s14,500 pp10 s43.4%69.8%80.5%3905
30,000 pp4.7 s18.3%31.0%60.5%81.2%79.2%83.7%3839
Llama 3.1 405B405 B · dense🤗
66 t/s14,500 pp10 s51.1%73.4%3762
362 t/s43,000 pp3.2 s5.2%72.0%78.8%77.2%3759
192 t/s21,000 pp6.5 s19.5%42.9%35.7%52.0%80.0%84.3%85.2%3697
Xiaomi MiMo V2.5 310B-A15B (MoE)310 B · 15 B active · moe🤗
323 t/s14,500 pp10 s65.8%56.1%3690
MiniMax M2.7 230B-A10B (MoE)230 B · 10 B active · moe🤗
484 t/s14,500 pp10 s45.1%56.2%78.0%3620
Xiaomi MiMo V2.5-Pro 1T-A42B (MoE)1020 B · 42 B active · moe🤗
30 t/s2,600 pp1.1 min34.0%68.4%57.2%78.9%3614
MiniMax M3 428B-A23B (MoE)428 B · 23 B active · moe🤗
210 t/s14,500 pp10 s59.0%3579
GPT-OSS 120B120 B · 5 B active · moe🤗
30,000 pp4.7 s18.5%18.7%16.2%62.4%87.8%80.9%90.0%3573
Kimi K2 1T (MoE)1000 B · 32 B active · moe🤗
40 t/s2,600 pp1.1 min4.7%27.8%65.8%60.0%85.3%75.1%81.1%3408
248 t/s21,000 pp6.5 s45.3%66.0%3361
Gemma 3 27B27 B · dense🤗
220 t/s21,000 pp6.5 s42.4%67.5%3321
Llama 4 Scout 109B-A17B (MoE)109 B · 17 B active · moe🤗
30,000 pp4.7 s32.8%57.2%74.3%3315
80 t/s9,200 pp15 s32.6%72.2%3174
Gemma 4 26B-A4B (MoE)26 B · 4 B active · moe🤗
660 t/s21,000 pp6.5 s8.7%34.2%13.8%17.4%77.1%82.3%82.6%3060
Qwen 3 Coder 30B-A3B (MoE)30 B · 3 B active · moe🤗
660 t/s21,000 pp6.5 s50.3%3042
Llama 3.3 70B70 B · dense🤗
140 t/s9,200 pp15 s28.8%50.5%68.9%2990
Llama 3.1 8B8 B · dense🤗
420 t/s75,000 pp1.9 s34.6%49.0%2527
Qwen 3 8B8 B · dense🤗
420 t/s75,000 pp1.9 s2.8%47.0%65.5%2325
Kimi K2.7 Code 1T (MoE)1000 B · 32 B active · moe🤗
40 t/s2,600 pp1.1 min48
30,000 pp4.7 s44
Mistral Large 3 675B-A41B (MoE)675 B · 41 B active · moe🤗
68 t/s4,200 pp40 s42
Cohere Command A+ 218B-A25B (MoE)218 B · 25 B active · moe🤗
194 t/s14,500 pp10 s39
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind · closed125 t/s2.1 min44.7%80.2%54.2%80.6%91.7%94.3%91.0%
ChatGPT 5.5OpenAI · closed61 t/s1.6 min52.2%82.0%58.6%88.7%88.0%93.6%
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic · closed57.4%80.4%63.2%
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic · closed59 t/s2.9 min57.9%69.2%88.6%93.6%
Open in the live picker (Q2 / Q4 / Q5 / Q8 toggles) → Compare 8× RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell server (768 GB) with another build → Try other hardware → Submit a benchmark for 8× RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell server (768 GB) ↗

Last updated 2026-07-11