All hardware

Best AI models that run on Octuple Intel Arc Pro B70 cluster

Intel · rack/large tower
Octuple Intel Arc Pro B70 cluster
256 GB 248 GB usable 608 GB/s $11k
switch in the live picker →
🧬
Same silicon, different chassis (ARC-PRO-B70 family). This build shares its compute platform with 3 other SKUs — identical bandwidth, memory tier, and software stack. The setup recipe below applies to all of them; chassis differences shift sustained throughput by ~5-10 % under full load.

What models fit this build

Octuple Intel Arc Pro B70 cluster has 248 GB of usable memory. Here's which open-weights model sizes fit at each quant, at ~8K context with an FP8 KV cache.

Largest comfortable fit: ~235B MoE at Q5 (~168 GB).

Model size Q2Q4Q5Q8
7–8B Fits Fits Fits Fits
13–14B Fits Fits Fits Fits
30–32B Fits Fits Fits Fits
70–72B Fits Fits Fits Fits
~120B MoE Fits Fits Fits Fits
~235B MoE Fits Fits Fits Won't fit
~670B MoE Won't fit Won't fit Won't fit Won't fit
1T+ MoE Won't fit Won't fit Won't fit Won't fit

✓ = the weights + FP8 KV cache fit within this build's usable memory at ~8K context. Longer context needs more — size any model in the picker →

Our picks for this build

Sourced from the State of Local AI snapshot — the model + quant + backend we'd actually deploy on this hardware today, with the recipe in the setup guide below.

Recommended

Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B (MoE)

35 B · 3B active Apache 2.0 🤗

Apr 2026 release. 35B / 3B active MoE — beats Gemma 4-31B on agentic coding, matches Sonnet on most vision tasks. Native 262 K context (extensible to 1 M), ~18 GB at Q4. The new local-coding king under 200 B.

≥22 GB Q4 126 t/s
  • HLE21.4%
  • TB251.5%
  • SWE-Pro49.5%
  • SWE-Ver73.4%

Coding: r/LocalLLaMA's pick for fast local coding on a 24 GB card at Q4_K_M — 3B active so it's snappy. Vibes-codes 'perfectly fine' in OpenCode/Claude Code per multiple weekly-megathreads. Simon Willison's pelican test (April 2026): 'Qwen3.6-35B-A3B on my laptop drew me a better pelican than Claude Opus 4.7' — still resonating in the community.

Agent: Solid in 5-15 tool-hop loops in Cline. Long-horizon (60+ min) Open-Claude sessions still lose thread — 3B active is a ceiling on planning. Note: Qwen-self-reported TB2 51.5 vs community 23-24% — gap is harness-driven (Terminus-2 vs little-coder agent).

Setup guide for Octuple Intel Arc Pro B70 cluster

Every known recipe for running a model on this build — sourced from the State of Local AI 2026-07-05 snapshot (2026-07-05). Pick the one that matches your model + quant, then follow the linked original write-up.

Recipes for Octuple Intel Arc Pro B70 cluster
ModelDecode tok/sPrompt processingRecipeRuns
qwen3-6-35b-a3b-moe@ Q4_K_M (UD) on llama.cpp (SYCL)~55@ 4K ~615@ 0.5KGitHub PMZFX

Want to compare this against other builds? Open the live picker (Q2 / Q4 / Q5 / Q8 toggles) or see best build by budget.

See all recipes

Every open-weights model that fits, ranked by composite score

Composite blends benchmark averages (60 %) with editorial 0-5 ratings (40 %). Closed-frontier references mix into the ranking and stay amber-tinted.

Modeltg/sppTTFT @ 100KHLETB2SWE-ProSWE-VerAiderLCBGPQAMMLU-ProScore
Qwen 3 235B-A22B (MoE)235 B · 22 B active · moe🤗
35 t/s900 pp2.3 min70.7%81.1%84.4%4964
Qwen 3 Next 80B-A3B (MoE)80 B · 3 B active · moe🤗
100 t/s1,900 pp1.0 min78.4%77.2%82.7%4920
15 t/s1,050 pp2.0 min77.6%4689
Qwen 3.5 9B9 B · dense🤗
98 t/s12,000 pp11 s65.6%81.7%82.5%4623
GLM-4.5-Air 106B (MoE)106 B · 12 B active · moe🤗
25 t/s1,900 pp1.0 min57.6%4488
DeepSeek V4-Flash 284B (MoE)284 B · 13 B active · moe🤗
59 t/s900 pp2.3 min29.4%56.9%52.6%79.0%91.6%88.1%86.4%4379
DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B26 B · 4 B active · diffusion-moe🤗
126 t/s3,200 pp40 s69.1%73.2%77.6%4358
Mistral Small 4 119B-A6B (MoE)119 B · 6 B active · moe🤗
50 t/s1,900 pp1.0 min71.2%4301
42 t/s3,200 pp40 s24.0%59.3%53.5%77.2%83.9%87.8%86.2%4280
Qwen 3 32B32 B · dense🤗
35 t/s3,200 pp40 s65.7%65.5%4278
28 t/s1,050 pp2.0 min57.5%65.2%84.0%4171
Phi-4 14B14 B · dense🤗
65 t/s7,000 pp18 s56.1%70.4%4160
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B (MoE)35 B · 3 B active · moe🤗
126 t/s3,200 pp40 s21.4%51.5%49.5%73.4%80.4%86.0%85.2%4084
Qwen 3.5 122B-A10B (MoE)122 B · 10 B active · moe🤗
30 t/s1,900 pp1.0 min25.3%49.4%72.0%78.9%86.6%86.7%4021
Tencent Hy3 295B-A21B (MoE)295 B · 21 B active · moe🤗
37 t/s900 pp2.3 min25.5%54.4%57.9%78.0%90.4%87.4%3971
25 t/s1,900 pp1.0 min18.3%31.0%60.5%81.2%79.2%83.7%3839
76 t/s7,000 pp18 s5.2%72.0%78.8%77.2%3759
37 t/s3,200 pp40 s19.5%42.9%35.7%52.0%80.0%84.3%85.2%3697
Xiaomi MiMo V2.5 310B-A15B (MoE)310 B · 15 B active · moe🤗
51 t/s900 pp2.3 min65.8%56.1%3690
MiniMax M2.7 230B-A10B (MoE)230 B · 10 B active · moe🤗
77 t/s900 pp2.3 min45.1%56.2%78.0%3620
GPT-OSS 120B120 B · 5 B active · moe🤗
60 t/s1,900 pp1.0 min18.5%18.7%16.2%62.4%87.8%80.9%90.0%3573
47 t/s3,200 pp40 s45.3%66.0%3361
Gemma 3 27B27 B · dense🤗
42 t/s3,200 pp40 s42.4%67.5%3321
Llama 4 Scout 109B-A17B (MoE)109 B · 17 B active · moe🤗
18 t/s1,900 pp1.0 min32.8%57.2%74.3%3315
16 t/s1,050 pp2.0 min32.6%72.2%3174
Gemma 4 26B-A4B (MoE)26 B · 4 B active · moe🤗
126 t/s3,200 pp40 s8.7%34.2%13.8%17.4%77.1%82.3%82.6%3060
Qwen 3 Coder 30B-A3B (MoE)30 B · 3 B active · moe🤗
126 t/s3,200 pp40 s50.3%3042
Llama 3.3 70B70 B · dense🤗
28 t/s1,050 pp2.0 min28.8%50.5%68.9%2990
Llama 3.1 8B8 B · dense🤗
110 t/s12,000 pp11 s34.6%49.0%2527
Qwen 3 8B8 B · dense🤗
110 t/s12,000 pp11 s2.8%47.0%65.5%2325
27 t/s1,900 pp1.0 min44
Cohere Command A+ 218B-A25B (MoE)218 B · 25 B active · moe🤗
31 t/s900 pp2.3 min39
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind · closed125 t/s2.1 min44.7%80.2%54.2%80.6%91.7%94.3%91.0%
ChatGPT 5.5OpenAI · closed61 t/s1.6 min52.2%82.0%58.6%88.7%88.0%93.6%
Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic · closed57.4%80.4%63.2%
Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic · closed59 t/s2.9 min57.9%69.2%88.6%93.6%
Open in the live picker (Q2 / Q4 / Q5 / Q8 toggles) → Compare Octuple Intel Arc Pro B70 cluster with another build → Try other hardware → Submit a benchmark for Octuple Intel Arc Pro B70 cluster ↗

Last updated 2026-07-11